All about Yogi Adityanath Sarkar to make Uttar Pradesh as Uttam Pradesh.
Friday, 24 March 2017
India questions NYT’s wisdom to criticize Adityanath becoming CM in Uttar Pradesh.
Ridiculously enough, the NYT wanted to reject even the close relationship of PM Modi with Ex US President Barack Obama and Present President Donald Trump. Now, NYT must write another editorial why Obama and Trump had/has such a close relation with a ‘supporter of extremist’ Modi.
Idiotic Editorial of NYT: Mr. Modi’s Perilous Embrace of Hindu Extremists.
Upananda Brahmachari | HENB | New Delhi | March 24, 2017::The anti-Modi culprits in New York Times are seen active again these days. In the past, the same culprits ran a campaign against Modi for US travel ban and their attitude surpassed the Pakistanis then as they were fed by the Arabs via Pakistanis and some anti Indian Khalistanis reside in Canada and obviously by CAIR & Huma Abedin.
Not only anti-Modi, the NYT Editorial on March 23, 2017 reflects its attitude being an attacker on Indian democracy, its chosen govt by public and against a statesman elected five times consecutively as member of parliament and adorned at last as a Saint CM in a most populous state in India.
As a retaliation, India reacted today sharply to The New York Times’ editorial criticizing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s choice of Adityanath Yogi as the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, and said the paper’s wisdom to write such a piece was “questionable”. “All editorials or opinions are subjective. This case is particularly so.
The wisdom in doubting the verdicts of genuine democratic exercises, at home or abroad, is questionable,” External Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Mr. Gopal Baglay. The NYT in the highly critical editorial, titled ‘Modi’s Perilous Embrace of Hindu Extremists’, said since he was elected in 2014, Modi has played a “cagey game, appeasing his party’s hard-line Hindu base while promoting secular goals of development and economic growth”.
The move by Prime Minister Modi’s party to name “firebrand Hindu cleric” Aditya Nath as Uttar Pradesh’s chief minister is a “shocking rebuke” to religious minorities, the editorial said.
Ridiculously enough, the NYT wanted to reject even the close relationship of PM Modi with Ex US President Barack Obama and Present President Donald Trump. Now, NYT must write another editorial why Obama and Trump had/has such a close relation with a ‘supporter of extremist’ Modi. NYT must target Mr Trump much as he used a Modi’s election punchline. Trump used a Modi like election tagline, ‘Ab Ki Baar, Trump Sarkar‘ and praised PM Modi abundantly!
Majority Indians believe in God and think all are happening according to his great planning.
The NYT Editorial in question is also a revelation by God’s grace. Without this exposure, who can understand much better that the owners, editors and the operatives in NYT are extreme anti-Modi, anti-Adityanath elements and obviously some puppets in the hands of anti-Indian radical forces connected with ‘Jihad’.
As, PM Modi and CM Adityanath are the strong faces against growing Jihadi terrorism in India, the pan Islamic Jihadi forces active in NYT are barking tirelessly against Modi and Yogi.
The NYT must be concerned with the Jihadi proliferation in United States. It is unnecessary to poke their ugly nose into Indian matters and they should not try to spoil and provoke against Indian strategy against Jihadi terrorism.
If least of conscience saved with NYT, they must apologize for its filthy editorial against Modi and Yogi.
And Trump administration must take proper action against NYT for spreading an anti-Indian propaganda.
__Writer can be reached at email@example.com .